Tag Archives: thinking

As Above

The thing that baffles most people is simple why or reason. We usually can figure out how, or what, or who, but the sparsity of why beckons humans to run to a corner and demand an explanation.  Within the definition of many institutions we can find our corners more narrow or broad respectively,  never the less, humans place themselves in these corners whenever they ask why or desire a reason.  But, is it wrong?!  Surely, there are people who don’t dare as question what is.  They generally “go with the flow” and, often, are a bit dull.  They are what I call “room fillers” because they are important for the energy and essence of human beings as their sheer simplicity and naivety counter acts the luring harps chords of reason.  It is the desire and envy that become the definition of “wrong” or anti-human aspects.  And, I mean these aspects to be of their extremity.  Should naivety be questioned for it’s severity of participation in humanity it is only less disarming because it creates a type of anti-naivety by simply being what is.  Whereas, desire and jealousy in their aspects do create a sort of anti-desire, which is repulsion.  And, it is in the creation of the antithesis of the negative aspects of these human quests that provoke yet another possibly destructive aspect.  This is why reason becomes so delicious, because it can never be tasted even to the point of gluttony or negativity.  We can not know too much because we do not know too little.  It’s in the balance of creating our corners that keep us safe from the reality of how much we really don’t know.  And because of this, we’re often surprised by the dark aspects expressed by others because from our corner of knowledge we attempt to project and expect goodness and light therein.  When a girlfriend leaves for another or a child is abandoned, we stand in our corners and demand or cry out “why?!”.  “Why do you not love me?!” “Why god did you let this child experience this?!”  Most people find reason in a greater good, or higher purpose.  And this is precisely my point, that in knowing we find what we don’t know, or can’t know.  When a solution or institution or reason surface our awareness,  it will simply entertain more of what we don’t know.  Humans that live in the naive contentment of the unknown are not burdened by their inability to satiate any resonating desire or hunger for knowledge.  In their corners, the corners don’t exist or are entirely boxed.  It’s really a matter of knowing that there can not be corners or boxes within reason or the why, and, thus, in their simple existence they’re never panged to seek nourishment because they don’t feel their hunger.  It exists.  It is a natural part of humanity to wonder why and find reason, but I believe we can chose to entertain what we want in our corners or what may stab us in the back later.  The balancing line of the known and unknown, defined by the life and death of awareness, constructs the necessity for institutions, friendships, and hope.  All of which are below.

Not in this picture haha.  No, this is a picture of me wondering why the past never happened, and the future will never come.  I looked at my jewelry and the hole in my back and realized I had been in my own corner with blinders to truth.  But, there’s no excuse because I should have known that the natural order of things would lead the least expected.  Though if I were to have known what would have happened then there wouldn’t be aspect of the need to know.  With necessity, we are full and nothing needs us.

Oh my jewelry is at http://www.facebook.com/thelaltar


Erupt To Late… Again!

Space and time.  Humans tell each other places to meet and at what time.  This achievement and expectation is a sort of cryptic message: “I am alive”.  If you are stood up then “I am not alive”.  Perhaps this doesn’t make sense, but think about the emotions typically elicited from such experiences.  How targeted is self being!  How can the geometrical point then degrade us? And to what extent, if my meeting with you is derailed, because I have something better to do?  Weights and balances are the formation of human morality.  What we ingest is only what we know, and knowing it doesn’t make it fabric.  No, it makes it a point.  A point in this thing of geometry.  But I warily suggest that this geometrical disposition plots merely human relevance, being sacred at the linear possibilities they entail.  In attempts to amend my mere point (yes a pun), perhaps there are no points at all.  Is geometry not the basic aspect of physics? And what says the human to the being (assuming he’s alien though such human examples can apply in different setting) he happens upon in a point of meet at the human level or measured scale? “Ah welcome to this point, let us chat and be on our way”?  What says the being to this human?  “I checked your human patterns and it crossed referenced with my ethereal measurements that I may, just give me a human balance…angel will do, meet at this ‘date and time’ that we may have this experience.  It’s been worthy of my purpose, and I depart into my world.  I’m late for meetings” “Ahh, good bye, sir Angel.”  How is it that humans can draw geometrical references to their relevance while claiming that various beings are there to help by being many places at once and at anytime, if time and space are relevant.  These are just things we say, because we can not be were we’re going, do not understand where we are, and can not be where we’ve been in it’s fullest.  The human designation of time and space appear to me to be completely moot.  Because if time and space exist for us by prescription to necessitate interaction with the dead, spirits, and even other humans then it entirely ceases to exist.  Not only because you can not measure a moment in it’s fullest “accuracy” ever, in comparison to the nature of a point never being a point as a point isn’t a dot or anything known like time.  If it is imagined as a dot then it is made up of cellular type structure (to give you a picture of how the line or dot can exist as it needs a thing or human to place it) to signify where it is located (space) but never ever can there be real space or a tip, for a lack of better word.  There is either an entire infinite mass within this dot or tip, or it can not exist.  If there is no point of reference, time and space wouldn’t exist because the theory is dependent on the human creation of what we finitely know to label it or balance it. Or perhaps, within everything we find, we find everything and therefor nothing or, more palpably, everything.  Even for the most atheist, or whoever believes only in human existence, this is easily applicable.  You can add a different dimension to the relevance of geometry to apply it in that aspect of existence or in another.  I don’t care.  If there is life, there is death.  If there is matter, there is anti-matter and so forth.  But, my point is that what is sacred is everything (much like a sphere, for simplicities sufferings) or just maybe sacred is nothing. Sorry to burst your bubble. Get it? Bubble?!

“I think therefore I am.”

-That one guy who wrote all those things.

It’s too late for me to erupt… I was in bed a long time ago, when i died.

Wanna hear my thoughts on reincarnation?!

Soon perhaps…. yawn! Goodnight!